ResClim Bergen subgroup: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Agenda | Agenda | ||
# Why are we here: short introduction to the idea (by | # Why are we here: short introduction to the idea (by Aleksi) <br /><br /> | ||
# Discussion (maybe divide into subgroups, depending on the number of people) | # Discussion (maybe divide into subgroups, depending on the number of people) | ||
#* Should there be two separate groups for PhD's and Post Docs | #* Should there be two separate groups for PhD's and Post Docs | ||
Yes, two groups with partly joint meetings | #* A: Yes, two groups with partly joint meetings | ||
#** Should we just divide immeadately, if we think this is the case? | #** Should we just divide immeadately, if we think this is the case? | ||
#* Who should be involved? (whole BCCR community?) | #* Who should be involved? (whole BCCR community?) | ||
#* Yes, should involve ResClim | #* A: Yes, should involve ResClim students, 'ResClim' subgroup | ||
#* What kind of format should we have? | #* What kind of format should we have? | ||
#** Presentations, problem solving events, 'what went wrong' -presentations, brainstorming events? | #** Presentations, problem solving events, 'what went wrong' -presentations, brainstorming events? | ||
#** All these are good ideas, it was decided that the next meeting will be brainstorming event | |||
#* Role of the webpage: gather information about all the practicalities (put the 'How to survive' -file from the old PhD forum online) <br /><br /> | |||
# | |||
# Core group? | # Core group? | ||
#* Since nothing works without responsible persons we should probably decide who want to be in charge of organizing meetings etc. Maybe these persons could use their 25% duty for this work...<br /><br /> | #* Since nothing works without responsible persons we should probably decide who want to be in charge of organizing meetings etc. Maybe these persons could use their 25% duty for this work...<br /><br /> | ||
# Next 'meeting' | # Next 'meeting' | ||
#* | #* Brainstorming event and bier afterwards, 4th of July | ||
Revision as of 14:05, 8 May 2013
For discussion, problem solving, socializing etc.
Meetings
8th of May 2013 - 15:00 - Kick off - Helland Hansen at GFI
Agenda
- Why are we here: short introduction to the idea (by Aleksi)
- Discussion (maybe divide into subgroups, depending on the number of people)
- Should there be two separate groups for PhD's and Post Docs
- A: Yes, two groups with partly joint meetings
- Should we just divide immeadately, if we think this is the case?
- Who should be involved? (whole BCCR community?)
- A: Yes, should involve ResClim students, 'ResClim' subgroup
- What kind of format should we have?
- Presentations, problem solving events, 'what went wrong' -presentations, brainstorming events?
- All these are good ideas, it was decided that the next meeting will be brainstorming event
- Role of the webpage: gather information about all the practicalities (put the 'How to survive' -file from the old PhD forum online)
- Core group?
- Since nothing works without responsible persons we should probably decide who want to be in charge of organizing meetings etc. Maybe these persons could use their 25% duty for this work...
- Since nothing works without responsible persons we should probably decide who want to be in charge of organizing meetings etc. Maybe these persons could use their 25% duty for this work...
- Next 'meeting'
- Brainstorming event and bier afterwards, 4th of July